ArticleeNeurologicalSci2025
Acoustic signatures of bulbar ALS: Predictive modeling with sustained vowels and LightGBM.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a degenerative neurologic disease with no definitive biomarkers for early detection. This paper discusses the use of acoustic analysis of sustained vowel phonations (SVP) and machine learning in ALS detection. Methods: An SVP corpus of 128 (64 /a/ and 64 /i/) from 31 patients with ALS and 33 healthy controls (HC) was employed. 131 acoustic features, including jitter, shimmer, Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), and Pathological Vibrato Index (PVI), were extracted. A LightGBM (Light Gradient Boosting Machine)-based model was built and optimized using 5-fold cross-validation to separate ALS cases. Model performance and feature importance were evaluated. Results: The model performed well with high predictability, yielding an RMSLE of 0.162 and most predictions closely correlating with actual diagnoses. The top features obtained were S55_i, CCI(2), and dCCa(12), which were consistently at the top of the ranking list, indicating their role in ALS detection. The PVI was determined to be a significant biomarker with high values having high correlations with ALS diagnoses. But the multimodal nature of the predictive values indicated some flaws in generalization. Conclusion: This paper demonstrates the applicability of acoustic analysis and machine learning for early ALS detection. The proposed method provides an affordable, low-cost, and non-invasive way for ALS diagnosis with potential for application in telemedicine and clinical settings. Future research must expand datasets and integrate additional diagnostic modalities to improve the model's robustness and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.