ArticleDigital health
Efficacy of computerized cognitive training using mobile devices to promote cognitive functioning in community-dwelling older adults with or without risk of mild cognitive impairment: A multi-centre longitudinal study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a 5-month computerized cognitive training programme (CCT) "Exercise your Brain" using mobile devices in improving cognitive functioning in community-dwelling older adults with and without risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: One hundred thirty-four older adults were recruited from 5-day activity centres for the older adults in Hong Kong using convenience sampling to participate in a 5-month CCT training. Participants were stratified into older adults with and without risk of MCI. Results: There was significant improvement (p < 0.001) in MoCA 5-min for the whole sample after 5-month CCT (d = 0.72) and the effects were maintained at 3-month follow-up. The group at risk of MCI improved their cognitive functioning immediately after intervention more than the non-MCI group (p < 0.001, d = 1.37 vs d = 0.55). In the task-based performance, there was significant interaction effect between memory and calculation with and without risk of MCI when years of formal education was a covariate, and that the non-MCI group had the highest improvement in Judgement (6.23%) and memory (5.43%), compared with that (1.47% and 2.33%) in the group at risk of MCI. The risk-of-MCI group had the highest improvement in attention (2.67%) and eye-hand coordination (4.87%), compared with that of the healthy older adults. Conclusion: Cognitive functioning in both older adults with or without risk of MCI was enhanced immediately after CCT using a mobile device and endured over a three-month follow-up. The training effect on the group at risk of MCI was significantly greater than that for the non-MCI group. With recent advances in mobile technology, remote cognitive training in terms of using mobile devices for older adults as primary and secondary preventions is applicable and practicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.