ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Comparative Study of Physicochemical and Structural Characteristics of Meat Analogues Produced From Soy and Wheat Proteins.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking Structural and Mechanical Properties to Multimodal Sensory Perception of Fibrousness in Plant-Based Meat Analogs.Journal of texture studies · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of Physicochemical and Structural Characteristics of Meat Analogues Produced From Soy and Wheat Proteins.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant-based meat analogues are gaining attention due to rising environmental concerns and demand for sustainable dietary options. However, achieving desirable texture and structure remains a challenge. This study investigated how varying proportions of soy protein isolate (SPI) and wheat gluten (WG) affect the physicochemical, structural, and sensory properties of high-moisture extruded meat analogues. SPI and WG were blended in different ratios (0%, 15%, 25%, 40% WG) and processed using a twin-screw extruder under controlled conditions. Additional ingredients included 7% vegetable oil, 5% pumpkin powder, 3.7% wheat starch, and 0.3% salt to enhance structure, color, and palatability. Physicochemical, textural, microstructural (SEM), and sensory analyses were conducted. Formulations containing 40% WG exhibited superior fibrous texture, hardness, chewiness, and flexibility. SEM analysis showed increasing WG content enhanced fiber density and alignment; however, the ultrastructure (defined here as sub-micrometer fibrous morphology) remained consistent in type. Protein solubility results suggested that hydrogen bonds, disulfide bridges, and hydrophobic interactions stabilized the network. Combining SPI and WG under high-moisture extrusion enhances the fibrous characteristics of meat analogues. Optimizing the WG content leads to improved texture and structural integrity, offering a viable strategy for developing consumer-acceptable, sustainable meat substitutes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.