Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808576›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2025

Ensemble survival analysis for preclinical cognitive decline prediction in Alzheimer's disease using longitudinal biomarkers.

Dhrubajyoti Ghosh, Samhita Pal, Michael Lutz, Sheng Luo, for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhrubajyoti GhoshDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3360-3786
Samhita PalDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-4930-916X
Michael LutzDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Sheng LuoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Research Education Component CoreP30AG072958 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GWENN A GARDEN, Heather E. Whitson · 2021 to 2026
$24.1M
Integrative modeling and dynamic prediction of Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG064803 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LUO, SHENG · 2020 to 2024
$2.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072958NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064803NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundPredicting the risk of clinical progression from cognitively normal (CN) status to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for early intervention in AD. Traditional survival models often fail to capture complex longitudinal biomarker patterns associated with disease progression.ObjectiveWe propose an ensemble survival analysis framework integrating multiple survival models to improve early prediction of clinical progression in initially cognitively normal individuals.MethodsWe analyzed longitudinal biomarker data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort, including 721 participants, limiting analysis to up to three visits (baseline, 6-month follow-up, 12-month follow-up). Of these, 142 (19.7%) experienced clinical progression to MCI or AD. Our approach combined penalized Cox regression (LASSO, Elastic Net) with advanced survival models (Random Survival Forest, DeepSurv, XGBoost). Model predictions were aggregated using ensemble averaging and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). Predictive performance was assessed using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent area under the curve (AUC).ResultsThe ensemble model achieved a peak C-index of 0.907 and an integrated time dependent AUC of 0.904, outperforming baseline-only models (C-index 0.608). One follow-up visit after baseline significantly improved prediction accuracy (48.1% C-index, 48.2% AUC gains), while adding a second follow-up provided only marginal gains (2.1% C-index, 2.7% AUC).ConclusionsOur ensemble survival framework effectively integrates diverse survival models and aggregation techniques to enhance early prediction of preclinical AD progression. These findings highlight the importance of leveraging longitudinal biomarker data, particularly one follow-up visit, for accurate risk stratification and personalized intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProdromal SymptomsSurvival AnalysisBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive impairmentcohort studiesearly detectionmachine learningrisk stratificationtime-to-event analysis

Identifiers

PMID40808576
PMCPMC12421452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.