Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808515›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Cost-Efficient Early Diagnostic Tool for Lung Cancer: Explainable AI in Clinical Systems.

Anu Maria Sebastian, David Peter, T P Rajagopal, Rinu Ann Sebastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anu Maria SebastianDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology, Kottayam, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2400-7691
David PeterDepartment of Computer Science, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, Kerala, India.
T P RajagopalDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Institute of Chest Diseases, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Rinu Ann SebastianSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionLung cancer has the highest mortality rate among all cancer types globally, largely due to delayed or ineffective diagnosis and treatment. Radiomics is commonly used to diagnose lung cancer, especially in later stages or during routine screenings. However, frequent radiological imaging poses health risks, and while advanced diagnostic alternatives exist, they are often costly and accessible only to a limited, privileged population. Leveraging clinical data using machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) enables a safer, more inclusive, and affordable solution. Due to a lack of interpretability, AI-based models for cancer diagnosis are less adopted by clinicians.MethodsThis study introduces a safe, inclusive, and cost-effective lung cancer diagnostic method using an explainable AI (XAI) model built on routine clinical data. It employs a stacking ensemble of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) to match the diagnostic performance of clean-data DNN models. By incorporating rare medical cases through Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN), the model reduces the risk of missing challenging, rare-case diagnoses.ResultsThe proposed XAI model demonstrates strong performance with an accuracy of 0.8558, AUC of 0.8600, precision of 0.8092, recall of 0.9282, and F1-score of 0.8646, notably improving rare case detection by over 50%. SHapley additive exPlanations(SHAP)-based interpretability highlights Erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR), intoxication-related factors, hemoglobin levels, and neutrophil counts as key features. The model also reveals associations, such as a link between heavy tobacco use and elevated ESR. Counterfactual explanations help identify features contributing to misdiagnoses by exposing sources of confusion in the model's decisions.ConclusionGiven the limited dataset size and geographic constraints, this research should be viewed as a prototype and in its current form, the model is best suited as a pre-screening tool to support early detection. With training on larger and more diverse datasets, the model has strong potential to evolve into a robust and scalable diagnostic solution.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAI modelscancer diagnosisclinical dataexplainable AIlung cancermachine learningmodel calibration

Identifiers

PMID40808515
PMCPMC12357035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.