ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Understanding Theory of Mind-pragmatics relationship through the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Theory of Mind-pragmatics relationship through the spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- At the heart of human communication: new views on the complex relationship between pragmatics and Theory of Mind.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our understanding of how pragmatic skills change in ageing is not systematic. Even less is known about the effects of pathological ageing-particularly in the context of neurodegenerative diseases-on pragmatic competence, changes in Theory of Mind and the potential inter-relationship between these domains. Given that pragmatic competence relies on a wide range of cognitive functions, examining pragmatic changes in speakers with neurodegenerative diseases may clarify whether these alterations are inherently pragmatic or arise from deficits in other cognitive domains, such as impairments in Theory of Mind. In this work, I inquire into how eight neurodegenerative conditions (behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, Alzheimer's disease, amnesic mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, cerebellar neurodegenerative disorders and right temporal degeneration) compromise pragmatic abilities and explore whether such impairments are linked to changes in Theory of Mind. Based on a narrative review of available experimental evidence, I come to several conclusions. First, only one neurodegenerative disease (behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia) shows up with pragmatic deficits directly linked to impairment in Theory of Mind. In the rest of the conditions, pragmatic deficits, although linked to Theory of Mind, derive from impairments in other cognitive functions (such as working memory or executive functions). Overall, pragmatic abilities are better predicted by their internal gradation (which abilities impose more cognitive load) than by the neural pathways of the diseases.This article is part of the theme issue 'At the heart of human communication: new views on the complex relationship between pragmatics and Theory of Mind'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.