ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Affective Theory of Mind and linguistic intimacy in irony production: a developmental perspective.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- At the heart of human communication: new views on the complex relationship between pragmatics and Theory of Mind.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Irony is challenging for school-aged children. It involves various processes, including advanced pragmatic and Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities. While there is extensive research on irony comprehension in children, less is known about irony production. This article discusses the possible role of linguistic intimacy and ToM in irony production in children. In irony production, positive linguistic intimacy is elicited to deliver a negative critical remark. Specifically, we will explore how linguistic intimacy, i.e. the feeling of being part of a community via implicit language, might mediate the production of irony versus sarcasm. Familiar contexts enhance both linguistic intimacy and ToM, making irony and sarcasm easier to produce. The article also addresses why irony, and especially sarcasm, is difficult for children to master. In childhood, the affective component of ToM is crucial for community building and belonging. As a result, children may suppress ironic and sarcastic comments to prevent negative social consequences. Specifically, sarcasm produces affective incoherence by targeting a person rather than a situation. For this reason, it might be less likely to be used due to its potential harm to linguistic intimacy. This perspective helps explain the developmental challenges of producing irony versus sarcasm, emphasizing the role of ToM and linguistic intimacy. Future research might test the hypothesis we propose.This article is part of the theme issue 'At the heart of human communication: new views on the complex relationship between pragmatics and Theory of Mind'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.