Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808381›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Impact of supplementing different sources of non-protein nitrogen on ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and microbial protein synthesis in beef cattle consuming a corn silage-based diet.

Juan de J Vargas, Federico Tarnonsky, Araceli Maderal, Federico Podversich, Ignacio Fernández-Marenchino, Wilmer Cuervo, Vanesa Ramirez, Sabina Novo, Andrés Fernández-Lehmann, Martín Ruiz-Moreno and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Juan de J VargasDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-3850
Federico TarnonskyDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-1956
Araceli MaderalDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.
Federico PodversichDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.ORCID 0000-0003-0852-790X
Ignacio Fernández-MarenchinoDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.
Wilmer CuervoDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.ORCID 0000-0002-3240-0338
Vanesa RamirezDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.
Sabina NovoDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.
Andrés Fernández-LehmannDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.
Martín Ruiz-MorenoDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.
Tessa M SchulmeisterDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-7442
Isabel Ruiz-AscacibarDepartment of Research and Development, Yara Industrial Solutions, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio R IpharraguerreInstitute of Human Nutrition and Food Science, Division of Food Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1105-6600
Nicolás DiLorenzoDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Florida Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Marianna, FL, USA32446.ORCID 0000-0001-5174-3427

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supplementation of low-protein diets with non-protein nitrogen (NPN) increases ruminal degradable protein and improves rumen fermentation and microbial growth. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the effect of supplementing urea-biuret (UB) and urea-biuret-nitrate (UBN) mixtures relative to urea (U) on rumen fermentation and microbial N outflow in growing steers. Twelve American Aberdeen steers were used in a replicated and balanced 3 × 3 Latin square design (LSD) with 3 periods of 35 d each. Steers were housed in pens and consumed a corn silage-based diet. Steers were stratified by body weight and randomly allocated to 1 of the 3 NPN supplementation treatments. Treatments were supplementation with U, UB, and UBN, adjusted to the amount of N provided by U when included at 1% of the diet on a dry matter (DM) basis. Intake and feeding behavior were individually recorded throughout the experiment. In each period, steers were adapted to increasing levels of NPN during the first 8 days. From days 19 to 23, feed and fecal samples were collected to assess nutrient digestibility. Samples of blood, rumen contents, and omasal digesta were collected on days 20 to 23. On day 24, rumen evacuation was performed, and subsequently steers were dosed with Co-EDTA and YbCl3 to determine the passage rate of digesta flow. Rumen fluid collection was conducted on days 24 and 25. Steers did not receive NPN supplementation from days 26 to 35 during the washout period. Microbial N flow was estimated for each animal within periods. Intake, digestibility, digesta flow, and microbial N flow were analyzed using a 3 × 3 LSD, while blood and rumen fermentation parameters were analyzed using a 3 × 3 LSD with repeated measures. Steers supplemented with UB tended (P < 0.07) to consume more DM and organic matter (OM) than those supplemented with UBN; however, animals supplemented with UBN tended (P = 0.051) to digest more acid detergent fiber in the total tract. Steers supplemented with U and UB showed greater (P < 0.05) DM and OM flow throughout the omasum than those with UBN. Microbial N flow, microbial efficiency, and the concentration of total volatile fatty acids were not different (P > 0.10) among NPN-supplemented treatments. Steers supplemented with UBN showed lesser (P < 0.05) concentration of ammonia than those with U and UB. In conclusion, novel NPN mixtures have the potential to modify ruminal fermentation without affecting microbial protein outflow.

Indexed as

DigestionNitrogenRumenAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietDietary SupplementsFermentationMaleNutrientsSilageUreaZea maysNitrogenNutrientsUreabackgroundingbiuretcorn silage-based dietnitratesurea

Identifiers

PMID40808381
PMCPMC12375956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.