Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808362›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025

Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting prognosis in sepsis patients with a history of cancer who were admitted to the intensive care unit.

Xiang Luo, Xiuji Kan, Dongliang Wang, Yu Shi, Siqi Zhu, Zhenyu Chen, Congcong Wang, Wenqi Zhu, Xiangtong Wang, Wenwen Sun

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiang LuoJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Xiuji KanFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, China.ORCID 0009-0003-3209-1787
Dongliang WangJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Yu ShiJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Siqi ZhuJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Zhenyu ChenGeneral Hospital of Eastern Theater Command of the People's Liberation Army, China.
Congcong WangJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Wenqi ZhuJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Xiangtong WangJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.
Wenwen SunJiangsu Province (Suqian) Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundSepsis is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill cancer patients; however, traditional prognostic models fail to capture the complexity of their immune and physiological interactions.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed electronic health records from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, including the records of patients with sepsis who had a documented history of cancer and were admitted to the intensive care unit. A two-step feature selection approach, combining least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and recursive feature elimination, was used to identify key prognostic variables. Eight machine learning algorithms, such as random forest and extreme gradient boosting, were trained and evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value, Brier scores, sensitivity, and specificity. SHapley Additive exPlanations, Partial Dependence Plots, and break down algorithms were applied to enhance model interpretability.ResultsThe final cohort included 3364 patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Nonsurvivors had significantly higher illness severity scores (Acute Physiology Score III and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) than survivors (p < 0.001). Among the tested models, the random forest model demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value (0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.80) and the lowest Brier score (0.15), indicating strong predictive accuracy.ConclusionsThis study developed machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients with a history of cancer, leveraging the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database for comprehensive risk assessment.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningNeoplasmsSepsisAgedAlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurvecancerMachine learningprediction modelsepsissupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40808362
PMCPMC12357034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.