ReviewOncology reports2025
Lymphadenectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Clinical insights and controversies (Review).
Review in Oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin for muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective single-center cohort analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a relatively rare but highly malignant tumor arising from the renal pelvis and the urothelial layer of the ureter, accounts for 5‑10% of all urothelial malignancies. The lack of specific early symptoms commonly results in a delayed diagnosis, with >60% of cases being diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease. Lymph node involvement can critically affect the clinical outcomes, thus serving as a key prognostic indicator, guiding both staging protocols and treatment strategies. Lymphadenectomy, typically performed alongside radical nephroureterectomy, not only assists in evaluating the extent of the regional metastases, but also plays a critical role in guiding both staging and treatment planning. Although several studies have suggested that a more extensive lymph node dissection (LND) can improve cancer‑specific survival and disease‑free survival rates, there is still no consensus on the optimal extent of dissection or a universally accepted surgical template. The present review aims to summarize the existing evidence on the efficacy of LND in UTUC, thus emphasizing its potential in staging, outcome prediction and possible survival benefits. The review also aims to address the challenges caused by inconsistent LND practices and the limited availability of robust prospective data. Furthermore, it discusses novel biomarkers that could improve patient classification, and proposes future research directions to improve the management of UTUC through more personalized and evidence‑driven LND strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.