Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808324›Full record

Observational studyAllergy2025

The Basophil Activation Test Is the Most Accurate Test in Predicting Allergic Reactions to Baked and Fresh Cow's Milk During Oral Food Challenges.

Irene Bartha, Holly Boyd, Ru-Xin Foong, Marta Krawiec, Andreina Marques-Mejias, Hannah F Marshall, Suzana Radulovic, Faye Harrison, Grammatiki Antoneria, Zainab Jama and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03309488 (Basophil Activation Test to Diagnose Food Allergy), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03309488 unknown statusnot on this map

Basophil Activation Test to Diagnose Food Allergy

TypeobservationalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2018 to 2021Enrolled600ConditionsFood Allergy, Food Allergy in Infants, Food Allergy in Children, Food Allergen SensitisationArmsOral food challenge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Casein sIgE avidity and milk basophil reactivity in children with cow's milk allergy.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Irene BarthaDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-4131
Holly BoydDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Ru-Xin FoongDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7974-0068
Marta KrawiecDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Andreina Marques-MejiasDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Hannah F MarshallDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Suzana RadulovicDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Faye HarrisonDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Grammatiki AntoneriaChildren's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Zainab JamaChildren's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Matthew KwokChildren's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Ewa PietraszewiczDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Malak EghleilibDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Cristian RicciAfrica Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research (AUTHeR), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Tom MarrsDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Gideon LackDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7350-4021
George Du ToitDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-2928
Alexandra F SantosDepartment of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-1436

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCow's milk is the most common cause of food allergy and related fatalities. Consumption of baked milk (BM) has been associated with better prognosis, nutrition and quality-of-life.

methodsThe BAT 2 milk study (NCT03309488) was a diagnostic study of cow's milk allergy designed according to STARD guidelines. All children had an oral food challenge (OFC) to BM, and those who tolerated BM were offered an OFC to fresh milk (FM). The diagnostic performance of the basophil activation test (BAT), skin prick test (SPT) and specific IgE (sIgE) was assessed in comparison with OFC.

resultsOut of the 150 children studied, 85% tolerated BM and 56% also tolerated FM. BAT had the best diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve 0.90 for BM and 0.81 for FM) compared with the other tests for both BM (sIgE: 0.79 and SPT: 0.70) and FM (sIgE: 0.74 and SPT: 0.78) allergies. Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs to select patients for OFC would have led to the following proportion of children having OFC (and positive OFC) to BM: 99% (13%) for SPT to baked milk, 82% (17%) for sIgE to boiled milk, and 49% (24%) for BAT to baked milk. In children younger than 2 years, only 27% required an OFC following BAT to BM (compared to 100% and 81% following SPT or sIgE to milk extract, respectively), with 100% diagnostic accuracy.

conclusionsBAT was the best test to identify children who reacted on OFC to BM or FM. Using 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity cut-offs, BAT ensured the lowest need for OFC and 100% diagnostic accuracy.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03309488.

Indexed as

Basophil Degranulation TestBasophilsMilkMilk HypersensitivityAllergensAnimalsCattleChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EInfantMaleROC CurveAllergensImmunoglobulin Eanaphylaxisbaked milkbasophil activation testcow's milk allergydiagnosisfood allergyfresh milkoral food challengesskin prick testspecific IgE

Identifiers

PMID40808324
PMCPMC12486342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.