Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808319›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2025

Retraction: Overexpressed miR-335-5p Reduces Atherosclerotic Vulnerable Plaque Formation in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Abstract readRetraction Notice
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

0 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

retractionSun D. Ma T. Zhang Y. Zhang F. Cui B. Overexpressed miR-335-5p Reduces Atherosclerotic Vulnerable Plaque Formation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 35, no. 2 (2021): e23608 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23608 The above article, published online on 5 December 2020 in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Rong Fu; and Wiley Periodicals, LLC. The authors notified the journal of potential data irregularities. An investigation by the publisher confirmed that elements in Figure 7 were duplicated, and that elements of Figure 9 were duplicated from a previously published article by a different author group (Zhang et al. 2020 [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.00804/full]). The retraction has been agreed due to the evidence of image duplication and manipulation which fundamentally compromises the conclusions presented in the article. The authors agree with this decision.

Identifiers

PMID40808319
PMCPMC12459215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.