Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808309›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Determining the optimal macroenvironment temperature to house lactating sows and their litters.

Mekenzie R Cecil, Samantha M Neeno, MaryKate H Byrd, Tyler Field, Brian T Richert, Allan P Schinckel, Jeremy N Marchant, Ji-Qin Ni, Robert M Stwalley, Jay S Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mekenzie R CecilDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Samantha M NeenoDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
MaryKate H ByrdDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Tyler FieldDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Brian T RichertDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Allan P SchinckelDepartment of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8614-7198
Jeremy N MarchantOrganic Plus Trust, Alexandria, VA, USA.
Ji-Qin NiDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Robert M StwalleyDepartment of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jay S JohnsonDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-4142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To accommodate piglet thermal requirements, producers use heating lamps or pads combined with maintaining farrowing room macroenvironment dry bulb temperatures (MTDB) at levels approaching heat stress for lactating sows. However, this may decrease sow feed consumption, milk production, and litter growth. Therefore, the study objective was to determine the MTDB that would improve sow and litter productivity and welfare measures. Lactating sows (N = 37; Landrace × Yorkshire; parity = 3.1 ± 1.7) and their litters (12.0 ± 1.0 piglets/litter) were housed in 1 of 3 farrowing room MTDB: LOW (n = 12 sows and litters; 15.0 ± 0.4 °C), MID (n = 13 sows and litters; 19.3 ± 0.2 °C), and HIGH (n = 12 sows and litters; 24.6 ± 0.8 °C). Lactating sows and litters were on trial from farrowing to weaning (day 19.8 ± 0.9 of age). Thermocouples were used to record individual farrowing crate MTDB, and piglets were provided a 0.34 × 1.52 m heating pad set to 35.0 °C. Piglets were individually weighed on days 1, 7, 14, and at weaning to determine average daily gain (ADG). Sow feed intake (FI) was recorded daily. Sow and piglet respiration rates [RR; breaths per minute (bpm)] and skin temperature were measured at 0800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 hours daily, and sow vaginal temperature (Tv) was measured in 10-min intervals. Core body temperature (Tc) was recorded on 1 piglet/litter in 10-min intervals using implanted loggers. Milk samples were collected on lactation days 6, 12, and 18. Data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX with either sow or litter as the experimental unit. Sow FI was greater (P < 0.01; +1.25 kg) for LOW and MID versus HIGH sows, but similar for LOW and MID sows. Piglet ADG was greater overall (P < 0.01; +45 g/d) for LOW and MID versus HIGH piglets, but similar for LOW and MID piglets. Sow RR was greater (P < 0.01; +18 bpm) for HIGH versus MID and LOW sows, but were similar for MID and LOW sows. Piglet Tc was reduced (P < 0.01; -0.25 °C) in HIGH versus MID and LOW litters but was similar for MID and LOW litters. Milk fat was reduced (P = 0.02; 1.2%) for LOW versus MID sows on d 12, but similar versus HIGH sows. Sow FI was maximized (quadratic; P < 0.01) at 17.2 °C. Piglet ADG and Tc were decreased (cubic; P < 0.01) and sow Tv was increased (cubic; P < 0.01) at 17.0, 18.9, and 20.9 °C, respectively. These data suggest that farrowing room MTDB between 17.0 and 21.0 °C combined with a piglet heating pad may maximize both sow and litter productivity and welfare measures.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryHousing, AnimalLactationTemperatureAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnimal WelfareFemaleSwineenvironmenthousinglactating sowlitterproductivitytemperaturewelfare

Identifiers

PMID40808309
PMCPMC12457823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.