ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Replication program of a single-chromosome budding yeast strain.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nuclear architecture and chromosome folding are often speculated to influence genome replication. In yeasts, centromeres cluster close to the spindle pole body and telomeres position at the nuclear periphery. This 'Rabl configuration' spatially segregates the most early and late replicating parts of the genome, centromeres and telomeres, respectively, suggesting that origin position along the centromere-telomere axis may influence origin activity. Here, we investigated DNA replication in a wild-type, 16-chromosome Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain and in its single-chromosome counterpart engineered by chromosome fusion and elimination of all but two telomeres and one centromere, which strongly affects genome folding and abrogates the Rabl conformation. Using nanopore sequencing-based methods, we found that the DNA replication program of both strains was virtually indistinguishable, with the exception of origin inactivation next to deleted centromeres and changes in origin efficiency and fork direction at chromosome fusions, as anticipated from the known origin-regulation properties of centromeres and telomeres. Only a handful of replication changes, mostly due to local origin repression, were observed elsewhere. Fork speed was also unaffected except at deleted centromeres. In conclusion, the DNA replication program of budding yeast is remarkably resilient to perturbations of chromosome folding and loss of the Rabl conformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.