Trial reportCancer2025
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for patients with previously treated select solid tumors: Results from the phase 2 LEAP-005 study recurrent glioblastoma cohort.
Trial report in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03797326 (A Multicenter, Open-label Phase 2 Study of Lenvatinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Open-label Phase 2 Study of Lenvatinib (E7080/MK-7902) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Previously Treated Subjects With Selected Solid Tumors (LEAP-005)
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Receptor tyrosine kinase targeted therapies in glioblastoma: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Donafenib suppresses glioblastoma progression: potential enhancement of therapeutic response in TMZ-resistant models.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Advancing systemic therapy for biliary tract cancer: current strategies and emerging paradigms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms of Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Strategies.Cells · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The authors report the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in participants with recurrent GBM enrolled in the phase 2, multicohort LEAP-005 study (NCT03797326).
methodsEligible participants had histologically confirmed GBM (World Health Organization grade IV) with disease progression since previous treatment, and one or more prior lines of therapy. Participants were enrolled regardless of tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status and received oral lenvatinib 20 mg per day plus intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The dual primary end points were objective response rate (ORR; per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology by blinded independent central review) and safety.
resultsA total of 101 participants were enrolled, with median (range) follow-up of 23.7 (16.4‒46.6) months. The median (range) duration of treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was 3.4 (0.3‒32.2) months. The ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 20% (13%‒29%), with 20 participants achieving a partial response, and the median (range) duration of response was 3.7 (1.4+ to 27.6) months. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 3.0 (2.7‒4.0) months and median (95% CI) overall survival was 8.6 (7.4‒10.8) months. Responses were observed regardless of PD-L1 status. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 93 participants (92%; grade 3‒5, n = 41 [41%]). Two participants died due to treatment-related adverse events (intestinal perforation and pneumonitis).
conclusionsThe combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in a small subpopulation of participants with recurrent GBM as second-line or later treatment. The safety profile was manageable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.