SynthesisBipolar disorders2025
The Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression With Mixed Features: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Bipolar disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression With Mixed Features: A Systematic Review.Bipolar disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Utility of Peripheral Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants in Differentiating Major Depressive Disorder from Bipolar Disorder: Associations with Antioxidant Levels, Hospitalization Outcomes, and Antidepressant Efficacy.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a need to provide up-to-date, clinically translatable data as it relates to the treatment of a major depressive episode (MDE) with mixed features.
methodsPubMed and OVID were searched from inception to July 22, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of pharmacological agents for adults with bipolar disorder (BD) or major depressive disorder (MDD) in an MDE with mixed features were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Studies (RoB2).
resultsA total of seven studies were included in this systematic review. The studies identified were all short-term acute studies ranging from 6 to 8 weeks. Treatment with lurasidone, olanzapine, cariprazine, lumateperone, quetiapine, and ziprasidone was associated with statistically significant reduction of depressive symptoms in MDEs with mixed features. Only lumateperone is studied in both BD subtypes [bipolar I disorder (BD-I), bipolar II disorder (BD-II)] and MDD, wherein efficacy in mixed features was the prespecified primary outcome. Lurasidone has a single study in MDD, while ziprasidone has data in a mixed sample of BD-II and MDD. Data for the other agents in mixed features is post hoc. Co-occurring hypomanic symptoms generally improved, and there was no significant difference between the above treatments and placebo with respect to hypomanic symptom severity intensification or treatment-emergent affective switching.
conclusionSelect atypical antipsychotics are effective in alleviating depressive symptoms in persons with mixed features; albeit, much of the data is obtained from post hoc analysis. Minimal evidence exists for the efficacy of lithium or valproate in the treatment of depressive episodes with mixed features. Antidepressant monotherapy has not been adequately evaluated in depressive episodes with mixed features. In addition, there is a pressing need for a consistent definition of mixed presentations to guide future interventional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.