ArticlePolymers2025
Viscoelastic Creep of 3D-Printed Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol Samples.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Metamaterial-Based Soft Sensors: Materials, Design, and Fabrications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article explores the viscoelastic properties of polyethylene terephthalate glycol samples created by fused filament fabrication, emphasising the anisotropy introduced during fabrication. The samples were fabricated with filament direction within samples aligned along the principal axis or perpendicular. A group of samples was loaded with constant stress for 5 h, and a recovery phase with no applied stress was observed. Another group of samples was loaded for 20 h without an additional deformation recovery phase. The continuous constant stress application results on the sample were analysed, and an overall effect of anisotropy on the samples was observed. Several models describing viscoelastic deformation were considered to adhere to experimental data, with the Prony series and general cubic theory models used in the final analysis. The models could describe experimental results up to 50% and 70% of sample strength, respectively. The analysis confirmed the nonlinear behaviour of printed samples under constant stress and the significant effect of anisotropy introduced by the 3D printing process on the material's elastic properties. The viscoelastic properties in both directions were described using the same parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.