ArticlePolymers2025
Hybrid Experimental-Machine Learning Study on the Mechanical Behavior of Polymer Composite Structures Fabricated via FDM.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Heterogeneous Multi-Output Stacked Learning Framework for Mechanical Property Prediction of FDM-Printed ASA: Experimental Validation.Polymers · 2026Article
- Investigation of the Thermo-Mechanical Properties of a 3D-Printed Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PPA Composite.Polymers · 2026Article
- Review of Progress of AI in Biomimetics: From Biological Patterns to Closed-Loop Discovery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synergistic Strengthening and Toughening of 3D-Printed Bioinspired Alumina Composites with a Multi-Scale Bouligand Structure.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- The Role of Residual Lignin in Microfibrillated Cellulose in Properties of Polylactic Acid Biocomposites.Polymers · 2026Article
- Effects of nozzle diameter and fiber volume fraction on tensile properties of FDM-printed CCF/PLA composites.PloS one · 2026Article
- Bending Properties of Standardized Photopolymer-Silicone Hybrid Structures Manufactured via PolyJet Matrix.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reusable 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Polyurethane Honeycombs for Mechanical Energy Absorption.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the mechanical behavior of polymer and composite specimens fabricated using fused deposition modeling (FDM), focusing on three material configurations: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), carbon fiber-reinforced polyphthalamide (PPA/Cf), and a sandwich-structured composite. A systematic experimental plan was developed using the Box-Behnken design (BBD) to investigate the effects of material type (MT), infill pattern (IP), and printing direction (PD) on tensile and flexural strength. Experimental results showed that the PPA/Cf material with a "Cross" IP printed "Flat" yielded the highest mechanical performance, achieving a tensile strength of 75.8 MPa and a flexural strength of 102.3 MPa. In contrast, the lowest values were observed in ABS parts with a "Grid" pattern and "Upright" orientation, recording 37.8 MPa tensile and 49.5 MPa flexural strength. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results confirmed that all three factors significantly influenced both outputs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.