ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Water Body Extraction Methods for SAR Images Fusing Sentinel-1 Dual-Polarized Water Index and Random Forest.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) technology has the characteristics of all-day and all-weather functionality; accordingly, it is not affected by rainy weather, overcoming the limitations of optical remote sensing, and it provides irreplaceable technical support for efficient water body extraction. To address the issues of low accuracy and unstable results in water body extraction from Sentinel-1 SAR images using a single method, a water body extraction method fusing the Sentinel-1 dual-polarized water index and random forest is proposed. This novel method enhances water extraction accuracy by integrating the results of two different algorithms, reducing the biases associated with single-method water body extraction. Taking Dalu Lake, Yinfu Reservoir, and Huashan Reservoir as the study areas, water body information was extracted from SAR images using the dual-polarized water body index, the random forest method, and the fusion method. Taking the normalized difference water body index extraction results obtained via Sentinel-2 optical images as a reference, the accuracy of different water body extraction methods when used with SAR images was quantitatively evaluated. The experimental results show that, compared with the dual-polarized water body index and the random forest method, the fusion method, on average, increased overall water body extraction accuracy and Kappa coefficients by 3.9% and 8.2%, respectively, in the Dalu Lake experimental area; by 1.8% and 3.5%, respectively, in the Yinfu Reservoir experimental area; and by 4.1% and 8.1%, respectively, in the Huashan Reservoir experimental area. Therefore, the fusion method of the dual-polarized water index and random forest effectively improves the accuracy and reliability of water body extraction from SAR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.