ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Improving Voice Spoofing Detection Through Extensive Analysis of Multicepstral Feature Reduction.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voice biometric systems play a critical role in numerous security applications, including electronic device authentication, banking transaction verification, and confidential communications. Despite their widespread utility, these systems are increasingly targeted by sophisticated spoofing attacks that leverage advanced artificial intelligence techniques to generate realistic synthetic speech. Addressing the vulnerabilities inherent to voice-based authentication systems has thus become both urgent and essential. This study proposes a novel experimental analysis that extensively explores various dimensionality reduction strategies in conjunction with supervised machine learning models to effectively identify spoofed voice signals. Our framework involves extracting multicepstral features followed by the application of diverse dimensionality reduction methods, such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Truncated Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), statistical feature selection (ANOVA F-value, Mutual Information), Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), regularization-based LASSO selection, Random Forest feature importance, and Permutation Importance techniques. Empirical evaluation using the ASVSpoof 2017 v2.0 dataset measures the classification performance with the Equal Error Rate (EER) metric, achieving values of approximately 10%. Our comparative analysis demonstrates significant performance gains when dimensionality reduction methods are applied, underscoring their value in enhancing the security and effectiveness of voice biometric verification systems against emerging spoofing threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.