Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807922›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Feature-Based Normality Models for Anomaly Detection.

Hui Yie Teh, Kevin I-Kai Wang, Andreas W Kempa-Liehr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hui Yie TehDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Software Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1899-6550
Kevin I-Kai WangDepartment of Electrical, Computer and Software Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8450-2558
Andreas W Kempa-LiehrDepartment of Engineering Science and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-0573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detecting previously unseen anomalies in sensor data is a challenging problem for artificial intelligence when sensor-specific and deployment-specific characteristics of the time series need to be learned from a short calibration period. From the application point of view, this challenge becomes increasingly important because many applications are gravitating towards utilising low-cost sensors for Internet of Things deployments. While these sensors offer cost-effectiveness and customisation, their data quality does not match that of their high-end counterparts. To improve sensor data quality while addressing the challenges of anomaly detection in Internet of Things applications, we present an anomaly detection framework that learns a normality model of sensor data. The framework models the typical behaviour of individual sensors, which is crucial for the reliable detection of sensor data anomalies, especially when dealing with sensors observing significantly different signal characteristics. Our framework learns sensor-specific normality models from a small set of anomaly-free training data while employing an unsupervised feature engineering approach to select statistically significant features. The selected features are subsequently used to train a Local Outlier Factor anomaly detection model, which adaptively determines the boundary separating normal data from anomalies. The proposed anomaly detection framework is evaluated on three real-world public environmental monitoring datasets with heterogeneous sensor readings. The sensor-specific normality models are learned from extremely short calibration periods (as short as the first 3 days or 10% of the total recorded data) and outperform four other state-of-the-art anomaly detection approaches with respect to F1-score (between 5.4% and 9.3% better) and Matthews correlation coefficient (between 4.0% and 7.6% better).

Indexed as

anomaly detectionfeature engineeringnormality modelsensor data qualitytime series analytics

Identifiers

PMID40807922
PMCPMC12349055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.