ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Image Quality Metrics as Loss Functions for Image Dehazing.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MLCANet: Multi-Level Composite Attention-Guided Network for Non-Homogeneous Image Dehazing in Adverse Weather Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The difficulty and manual nature of procuring human evaluators for ranking the quality of images affected by various types of degradations, and of those cleaned up by developed algorithms, has lead to the widespread adoption of automated metrics, like the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and the Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM). However, disparities between rankings given by these metrics and those given by human evaluators have encouraged the development of improved image quality assessment (IQA) metrics that are a better fit for this purpose. These methods have been previously used solely for quality assessments and not as objectives in the training of neural networks for high-level vision tasks, despite the potential improvements that may come about by directly optimizing for desired metrics. This paper examines the adequacy of ten recent IQA metrics, compared with standard loss functions, within two trained dehazing neural networks, with observed broad improvement in their performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.