ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Semi-Automated RGB-Based Method for Wildlife Crop Damage Detection Using QGIS-Integrated UAV Workflow.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring crop damage caused by wildlife remains a significant challenge in agricultural management, particularly in the case of large-scale monocultures such as maize. The given study presents a semi-automated process for detecting wildlife-induced damage using RGB imagery acquired from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The method is designed for non-specialist users and is fully integrated within the QGIS platform. The proposed approach involves calculating three vegetation indices-Excess Green (ExG), Green Leaf Index (GLI), and Modified Green-Red Vegetation Index (MGRVI)-based on a standardized orthomosaic generated from RGB images collected via UAV. Subsequently, an unsupervised k-means clustering algorithm was applied to divide the field into five vegetation vigor classes. Within each class, 25% of the pixels with the lowest average index values were preliminarily classified as damaged. A dedicated QGIS plugin enables drone data analysts (Drone Data Analysts-DDAs) to adjust index thresholds, based on visual interpretation, interactively. The method was validated on a 50-hectare maize field, where 7 hectares of damage (15% of the area) were identified. The results indicate a high level of agreement between the automated and manual classifications, with an overall accuracy of 81%. The highest concentration of damage occurred in the "moderate" and "low" vigor zones. Final products included vigor classification maps, binary damage masks, and summary reports in HTML and DOCX formats with visualizations and statistical data. The results confirm the effectiveness and scalability of the proposed RGB-based procedure for crop damage assessment. The method offers a repeatable, cost-effective, and field-operable alternative to multispectral or AI-based approaches, making it suitable for integration with precision agriculture practices and wildlife population management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.