ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Individual Segmentation of Intertwined Apple Trees in a Row via Prompt Engineering.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Training-FreeDetector-to-Promptable-Segmenter Integration for Stacked Cartons: Prompt Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Offs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer vision is of wide interest to perform the phenotyping of horticultural crops such as apple trees at high throughput. In orchards specially constructed for variety testing or breeding programs, computer vision tools should be able to extract phenotypical information form each tree separately. We focus on segmenting individual apple trees as the main task in this context. Segmenting individual apple trees in dense orchard rows is challenging because of the complexity of outdoor illumination and intertwined branches. Traditional methods rely on supervised learning, which requires a large amount of annotated data. In this study, we explore an alternative approach using prompt engineering with the Segment Anything Model and its variants in a zero-shot setting. Specifically, we first detect the trunk and then position a prompt (five points in a diamond shape) located above the detected trunk to feed to the Segment Anything Model. We evaluate our method on the apple REFPOP, a new large-scale European apple tree dataset and on another publicly available dataset. On these datasets, our trunk detector, which utilizes a trained YOLOv11 model, achieves a good detection rate of 97% based on the prompt located above the detected trunk, achieving a Dice score of 70% without training on the REFPOP dataset and 84% without training on the publicly available dataset.We demonstrate that our method equals or even outperforms purely supervised segmentation approaches or non-prompted foundation models. These results underscore the potential of foundational models guided by well-designed prompts as scalable and annotation-efficient solutions for plant segmentation in complex agricultural environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.