ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Structural Component Identification and Damage Localization of Civil Infrastructure Using Semantic Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Block Relative Edge Density (ABRED): An Interpretable Feature for Tunnel Surrounding Rock Fracture Identification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- UAV and Deep Learning for Building Façade Defect Detection: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual inspection of civil infrastructure for structural health assessment, as performed by structural engineers, is expensive and time-consuming. Therefore, automating this process is highly attractive, which has received significant attention in recent years. With the increasing capabilities of computers, deep neural networks have become a standard tool and can be used for structural health inspections. A key challenge, however, is the availability of reliable datasets. In this work, the U-net and DeepLab v3+ convolutional neural networks are trained on a synthetic Tokaido dataset. This dataset comprises images representative of data acquired by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery and corresponding ground truth data. The data includes semantic segmentation masks for both categorizing structural elements (slabs, beams, and columns) and assessing structural damage (concrete spalling or exposed rebars). Data augmentation, including both image quality degradation (e.g., brightness modification, added noise) and image transformations (e.g., image flipping), is applied to the synthetic dataset. The selected neural network architectures achieve excellent performance, reaching values of 97% for accuracy and 87% for Mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) on the validation data. It also demonstrates promising results in the semantic segmentation of real-world structures captured in photographs, despite being trained solely on synthetic data. Additionally, based on the obtained results of semantic segmentation, it can be concluded that DeepLabV3+ outperforms U-net in structural component identification. However, this is not the case in the damage identification task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.