ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sensor Fusion for Enhancing Motion Capture: Integrating Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual-Inertial Fusion Framework for Isolating Seated Human-Body Vibration in Dynamic Vehicular Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sensor Fusion for Enhancing Motion Capture: Integrating Optical and Inertial Motion Capture Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to create and evaluate an optimization-based sensor fusion algorithm that combines Optical Motion Capture (OMC) and Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) measurements to provide a more efficient and reliable gap-filling process for OMC measurements to be used for future research. The proposed algorithm takes the first and last frame of OMC data and fills the rest with gyroscope data from the IMC. The algorithm was validated using data from twelve participants who performed a hand cycling task with an inertial measurement unit (IMU) placed on their hand, forearm, and upper arm. The OMC tracked a cluster of reflective markers that were placed on top of each IMU. The proposed algorithm was evaluated with simulated gaps of up to five minutes. Average total root-mean-square errors (RMSE) of <1.8° across a 5 min duration were observed for all sensor placements for the cyclic upper limb motion pattern used in this study. The results demonstrated that the fusion of these two sensing modalities is feasible and shines light on the possibility of more field-based studies for human motion analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.