Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807833›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Perspective on Quality Evaluation for AI-Generated Videos.

Zhichao Zhang, Wei Sun, Guangtao Zhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhichao ZhangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-6383
Wei SunDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8162-1949
Guangtao ZhaiDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8165-9322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in AI-generated content (AIGC) have transformed video creation, empowering systems to translate text, images, or audio into visually compelling stories. Yet reliable evaluation of these machine-crafted videos remains elusive because quality is governed not only by spatial fidelity within individual frames but also by temporal coherence across frames and precise semantic alignment with the intended message. The foundational role of sensor technologies is critical, as they determine the physical plausibility of AIGC outputs. In this perspective, we argue that multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are poised to become the cornerstone of next-generation video quality assessment (VQA). By jointly encoding cues from multiple modalities such as vision, language, sound, and even depth, the MLLM can leverage its powerful language understanding capabilities to assess the quality of scene composition, motion dynamics, and narrative consistency, overcoming the fragmentation of hand-engineered metrics and the poor generalization ability of CNN-based methods. Furthermore, we provide a comprehensive analysis of current methodologies for assessing AIGC video quality, including the evolution of generation models, dataset design, quality dimensions, and evaluation frameworks. We argue that advances in sensor fusion enable MLLMs to combine low-level physical constraints with high-level semantic interpretations, further enhancing the accuracy of visual quality assessment.

Indexed as

AI-generated videoMLLMvideo quality assessment

Identifiers

PMID40807833
PMCPMC12349415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.