ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Uncertainty Evaluation of Two-Dimensional Horizontal Distributed Photometric Sensor Based on MCM for Illuminance Measurement Task.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the demand for precise measurement of illuminance distribution in the quality control of LED monitoring fill light products and the iterative direction of secondary optical design, distributed photometric sensors have shown advantages, but their measurement uncertainty assessment faces challenges. This paper addresses the problem of uncertainty evaluation in photometric parameter measurement with a two-dimensional horizontal distributed photometric sensor and proposes an uncertainty evaluation framework for this task. We have established an uncertainty analysis model for the measurement system and provided two uncertainty synthesis methods, The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement and the Monte Carlo method. This study designed illuminance measurement experiments to validate the feasibility of the proposed uncertainty evaluation method. The results demonstrate that the actual probability distribution of the measurement data follows a trapezoidal distribution. Furthermore, the expanded uncertainty calculated using the GUM method was 21.1% higher than that obtained by the MCM. This work effectively addresses the uncertainty evaluation challenge for illuminance measurement tasks using a two-dimensional horizontal distributed photometric sensor. The findings offer valuable reference for the uncertainty assessment of other high-precision optical instruments and possess significant engineering value in enhancing the reliability of optical metrology systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.