ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Investigation of Personalized Visual Stimuli via Checkerboard Patterns Using Flickering Circles for SSVEP-Based BCI System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond flickering: introducing code-modulated motion visual evoked potentials for brain-computer interfacing.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we conducted two steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) studies to develop a practical brain-computer interface (BCI) system for communication and control applications. The first study introduces a novel visual stimulus paradigm that combines checkerboard patterns with flickering circles configured in single-, double-, and triple-layer forms. We tested three flickering frequency conditions: a single fundamental frequency, a combination of the fundamental frequency and its harmonics, and a combination of two fundamental frequencies. The second study utilizes personalized visual stimuli to enhance SSVEP responses. SSVEP detection was performed using power spectral density (PSD) analysis by employing Welch's method and relative PSD to extract SSVEP features. Commands classification was carried out using a proposed decision rule-based algorithm. The results were compared with those of a conventional checkerboard pattern with flickering squares. The experimental findings indicate that single-layer flickering circle patterns exhibit comparable or improved performance when compared with the conventional stimuli, particularly when customized for individual users. Conversely, the multilayer patterns tended to increase visual fatigue. Furthermore, individualized stimuli achieved a classification accuracy of 90.2% in real-time SSVEP-based BCI systems for six-command generation tasks. The personalized visual stimuli can enhance user experience and system performance, thereby supporting the development of a practical SSVEP-based BCI system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.