Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807786›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Analysis of Security Challenges in ZigBee 3.0 Networks.

Akbar Ghobakhlou, Duaa Zuhair Al-Hamid, Sara Zandi, James Cato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akbar GhobakhlouDepartment of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-2641
Duaa Zuhair Al-HamidDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2832-7190
Sara ZandiSchool of Tech, New Zealand Skills and Education College, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0009-4420-4519
James CatoDepartment of Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Auckland University of Technology (AUT), Auckland 1010, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ZigBee, a wireless technology standard for the Internet of Things (IoT) devices based on IEEE 802.15.4, faces significant security challenges that threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of its networks. Despite using 128-bit Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) with symmetric keys for node authentication and data confidentiality, ZigBee's design constraints, such as low cost and low power, have allowed security issues to persist. While ZigBee 3.0 introduces enhanced security features such as install codes and trust centre link key updates, there remains a lack of empirical research evaluating their effectiveness in real-world deployments. This research addresses the gap by conducting a comprehensive, hardware-based analysis of ZigBee 3.0 networks using XBee 3 radio modules and ZigBee-compatible devices. We investigate the following three core security issues: (a) the security of symmetric keys, focusing on vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to obtain these keys; (b) the impact of compromised symmetric keys on network confidentiality; and (c) susceptibility to Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks due to insufficient protection mechanisms. Our experiments simulate realistic attack scenarios under both Centralised and Distributed Security Models to assess the protocol's resilience. The findings reveal that while ZigBee 3.0 improves upon earlier versions, certain vulnerabilities remain exploitable. We also propose practical security controls and best practices to mitigate these attacks and enhance network security. This work contributes novel insights into the operational security of ZigBee 3.0, offering guidance for secure IoT deployments and advancing the understanding of protocol-level defences in constrained environments.

Indexed as

Centralised Security Model (CSM)denial of service (DoS)Internet of Things (IoT)ZigBee 3.0

Identifiers

PMID40807786
PMCPMC12349651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.