Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807751›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Real-Time Object Detection for Edge Computing-Based Agricultural Automation: A Case Study Comparing the YOLOX and YOLOv12 Architectures and Their Performance in Potato Harvesting Systems.

Joonam Kim, Giryeon Kim, Rena Yoshitoshi, Kenichi Tokuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joonam KimResearch Center for Agricultural Robotics, National Agricultural and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba 3050856, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1498-8326
Giryeon KimResearch Center for Agricultural Robotics, National Agricultural and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba 3050856, Japan.
Rena YoshitoshiResearch Center for Agricultural Robotics, National Agricultural and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba 3050856, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6589-4442
Kenichi TokudaResearch Center for Agricultural Robotics, National Agricultural and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba 3050856, Japan.

Funding

Agricultural Machinery Technology Cluster Project of The Institute of Agricultural Machinery, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (IAM/NARO). 2023-Agricultural Machinery Technology Cluster Project
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we presents a case study involving the implementation experience and a methodological framework through a comprehensive comparative analysis of the YOLOX and YOLOv12 object detection models for agricultural automation systems deployed in the Jetson AGX Orin edge computing platform. We examined the architectural differences between the models and their impact on detection capabilities in data-imbalanced potato-harvesting environments. Both models were trained on identical datasets with images capturing potatoes, soil clods, and stones, and their performances were evaluated through 30 independent trials under controlled conditions. Statistical analysis confirmed that YOLOX achieved a significantly higher throughput (107 vs. 45 FPS,

Indexed as

AgricultureAutomationSolanum tuberosumAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-Assistedagricultural automationdata imbalanceedge computingJetson AGX Orinobject detectionpotato harvestingreal-time processingYOLOv12YOLOX

Identifiers

PMID40807751
PMCPMC12349356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.