ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Segmentation-Assisted Fusion-Based Classification for Automated CXR Image Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HybridCATNet: an explainable CNN-Transformer framework with early multi-channel fusion and uncertainty estimation for pneumonia detection from chest X-rays.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate classification of chest X-ray (CXR) images is crucial for diagnosing lung diseases in medical imaging. Existing deep learning models for CXR image classification face challenges in distinguishing non-lung features. In this work, we propose a new segmentation-assisted fusion-based classification method. The method involves two stages: first, we use a lightweight segmentation model, Partial Convolutional Segmentation Network (PCSNet) designed based on an encoder-decoder architecture, to accurately obtain lung masks from CXR images. Then, a fusion of the masked CXR image with the original image enables classification using the improved lightweight ShuffleNetV2 model. The proposed method is trained and evaluated on segmentation datasets including the Montgomery County Dataset (MC) and Shenzhen Hospital Dataset (SH), and classification datasets such as Chest X-Ray Images for Pneumonia (CXIP) and COVIDx. Compared with seven segmentation models (U-Net, Attention-Net, SegNet, FPNNet, DANet, DMNet, and SETR), five classification models (ResNet34, ResNet50, DenseNet121, Swin-Transforms, and ShuffleNetV2), and state-of-the-art methods, our PCSNet model achieved high segmentation performance on CXR images. Compared to the state-of-the-art Attention-Net model, the accuracy of PCSNet increased by 0.19% (98.94% vs. 98.75%), and the boundary accuracy improved by 0.3% (97.86% vs. 97.56%), while requiring 62% fewer parameters. For pneumonia classification using the CXIP dataset, the proposed strategy outperforms the current best model by 0.14% in accuracy (98.55% vs. 98.41%). For COVID-19 classification with the COVIDx dataset, the model reached an accuracy of 97.50%, the absolute improvement in accuracy compared to CovXNet was 0.1%, and clinical metrics demonstrate more significant gains: specificity increased from 94.7% to 99.5%. These results highlight the model's effectiveness in medical image analysis, demonstrating clinically meaningful improvements over state-of-the-art approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.