Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807746›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Segmentation-Assisted Fusion-Based Classification for Automated CXR Image Analysis.

Shilu Kang, Dongfang Li, Jiaxin Xu, Aokun Mei, Hua Huo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shilu KangInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8291-963X
Dongfang LiInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.
Jiaxin XuInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.
Aokun MeiInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.
Hua HuoInformation Engineering College, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9545-5443

Funding

Central Government Guiding Local Science and Technology Development Fund Program of Henan Province Z20221343032Major Science and Technology Program of Henan Province 221100210500National Natural Science Foundation of China 61672210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of chest X-ray (CXR) images is crucial for diagnosing lung diseases in medical imaging. Existing deep learning models for CXR image classification face challenges in distinguishing non-lung features. In this work, we propose a new segmentation-assisted fusion-based classification method. The method involves two stages: first, we use a lightweight segmentation model, Partial Convolutional Segmentation Network (PCSNet) designed based on an encoder-decoder architecture, to accurately obtain lung masks from CXR images. Then, a fusion of the masked CXR image with the original image enables classification using the improved lightweight ShuffleNetV2 model. The proposed method is trained and evaluated on segmentation datasets including the Montgomery County Dataset (MC) and Shenzhen Hospital Dataset (SH), and classification datasets such as Chest X-Ray Images for Pneumonia (CXIP) and COVIDx. Compared with seven segmentation models (U-Net, Attention-Net, SegNet, FPNNet, DANet, DMNet, and SETR), five classification models (ResNet34, ResNet50, DenseNet121, Swin-Transforms, and ShuffleNetV2), and state-of-the-art methods, our PCSNet model achieved high segmentation performance on CXR images. Compared to the state-of-the-art Attention-Net model, the accuracy of PCSNet increased by 0.19% (98.94% vs. 98.75%), and the boundary accuracy improved by 0.3% (97.86% vs. 97.56%), while requiring 62% fewer parameters. For pneumonia classification using the CXIP dataset, the proposed strategy outperforms the current best model by 0.14% in accuracy (98.55% vs. 98.41%). For COVID-19 classification with the COVIDx dataset, the model reached an accuracy of 97.50%, the absolute improvement in accuracy compared to CovXNet was 0.1%, and clinical metrics demonstrate more significant gains: specificity increased from 94.7% to 99.5%. These results highlight the model's effectiveness in medical image analysis, demonstrating clinically meaningful improvements over state-of-the-art approaches.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLungRadiography, ThoracicAlgorithmsCOVID-19Deep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPneumoniaSARS-CoV-2chest X-rayimage classificationlightweight modelslung diseasessegmentation model

Identifiers

PMID40807746
PMCPMC12349148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.