ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Active Touch Sensing for Robust Hole Detection in Assembly Tasks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we propose an active touch sensing algorithm designed for robust hole localization in 3D objects, specifically aimed at assembly tasks such as peg-in-hole operations. Unlike general object detection algorithms, our solution is tailored for precise localization of features like hole openings using sparse tactile feedback. The method builds on a prior 3D map of the object and employs a series of iterative search algorithms to refine localization by aligning tactile sensing data with the object's shape. It is specifically designed for objects composed of multiple parallel surfaces located at distinct heights; a common characteristic in many assembly tasks. In addition to the deterministic approach, we introduce a probabilistic version of the algorithm, which effectively compensates for sensor noise and inaccuracies in the 3D map. This probabilistic framework significantly improves the algorithm's resilience in real-world environments, ensuring reliable performance even under imperfect conditions. We validate the method's effectiveness for several assembly tasks, such as inserting a plug into a socket, demonstrating its speed and accuracy. The proposed algorithm outperforms traditional search strategies, offering a robust solution for assembly operations in industrial and domestic applications with limited sensory input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.