ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Airport-FOD3S: A Three-Stage Detection-Driven Framework for Realistic Foreign Object Debris Synthesis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent Detection and Description of Foreign Object Debris on Airport Pavements via Enhanced YOLOv7 and GPT-Based Prompt Engineering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional Foreign Object Debris (FOD) detection methods face challenges such as difficulties in large-size data acquisition and the ineffective application of detection algorithms with high accuracy. In this paper, image data augmentation was performed using generative adversarial networks and diffusion models, generating images of monitoring areas under different environmental conditions and FOD images of varied types. Additionally, a three-stage image blending method considering size transformation, a seamless process, and style transfer was proposed. The image quality of different blending methods was quantitatively evaluated using metrics such as structural similarity index and peak signal-to-noise ratio, as well as Depthanything. Finally, object detection models with a similarity distance strategy (SimD), including Faster R-CNN, YOLOv8, and YOLOv11, were tested on the dataset. The experimental results demonstrated that realistic FOD data were effectively generated. The Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) of the synthesized image by the proposed three-stage image blending method outperformed the other methods, reaching 0.99 and 45 dB. YOLOv11 with SimD trained on the augmented dataset achieved the mAP of 86.95%. Based on the results, it could be concluded that both data augmentation and SimD significantly improved the accuracy of FOD detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.