ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Spatiotemporal Mapping of Grazing Livestock Behaviours Using Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grassland ecosystems are fundamentally shaped by the complex behaviours of livestock. While most previous studies have monitored grassland health using vegetation indices, such as NDVI and LAI, fewer have investigated livestock behaviours as direct drivers of grassland degradation. In particular, the spatial clustering and temporal concentration patterns of livestock behaviours are critical yet underexplored factors that significantly influence grassland ecosystems. This study investigated the spatiotemporal patterns of livestock behaviours under different grazing management systems and grazing-intensity gradients (GIGs) in Wenchang, China, using high-resolution GPS tracking data and machine learning classification. the K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) model combined with SMOTE-ENN resampling achieved the highest accuracy, with F1-scores of 0.960 and 0.956 for continuous and rotational grazing datasets. The results showed that the continuous grazing system failed to mitigate grazing pressure when grazing intensity was reduced, as the spatial clustering of livestock behaviours did not decrease accordingly, and the frequency of temporal peaks in grazing behaviour even showed an increasing trend. Conversely, the rotational grazing system responded more effectively, as reduced GIGs led to more evenly distributed temporal activity patterns and lower spatial clustering. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating livestock behavioural patterns into grassland monitoring and offer data-driven insights for sustainable grazing management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.