ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
LCFC-Laptop: A Benchmark Dataset for Detecting Surface Defects in Consumer Electronics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a high-market-value sector, the consumer electronics industry is particularly vulnerable to reputational damage from surface defects in shipped products. However, the high level of automation and the short product life cycles in this industry make defect sample collection both difficult and inefficient. This challenge has led to a severe shortage of publicly available, comprehensive datasets dedicated to surface defect detection, limiting the development of targeted methodologies in the academic community. Most existing datasets focus on general-purpose object categories, such as those in the COCO and PASCAL VOC datasets, or on industrial surfaces, such as those in the MvTec AD and ZJU-Leaper datasets. However, these datasets differ significantly in structure, defect types, and imaging conditions from those specific to consumer electronics. As a result, models trained on them often perform poorly when applied to surface defect detection tasks in this domain. To address this issue, the present study introduces a specialized optical sampling system with six distinct lighting configurations, each designed to highlight different surface defect types. These lighting conditions were calibrated by experienced optical engineers to maximize defect visibility and detectability. Using this system, 14,478 high-resolution defect images were collected from actual production environments. These images cover more than six defect types, such as scratches, plain particles, edge particles, dirt, collisions, and unknown defects. After data acquisition, senior quality control inspectors and manufacturing engineers established standardized annotation criteria based on real-world industrial acceptance standards. Annotations were then applied using bounding boxes for object detection and pixelwise masks for semantic segmentation. In addition to the dataset construction scheme, commonly used semantic segmentation methods were benchmarked using the provided mask annotations. The resulting dataset has been made publicly available to support the research community in developing, testing, and refining advanced surface defect detection algorithms under realistic conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive, multiclass, multi-defect dataset for surface defect detection in the consumer electronics domain that provides pixel-level ground-truth annotations and is explicitly designed for real-world applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.