Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807704›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

LCFC-Laptop: A Benchmark Dataset for Detecting Surface Defects in Consumer Electronics.

Hua-Feng Dai, Jyun-Rong Wang, Quan Zhong, Dong Qin, Hao Liu, Fei Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hua-Feng DaiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7323-4842
Jyun-Rong WangLCFC (Hefei) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei 230088, China.
Quan ZhongLCFC (Hefei) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei 230088, China.
Dong QinLCFC (Hefei) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei 230088, China.
Hao LiuLCFC (Hefei) Electronics Technology Co., Ltd., Hefei 230088, China.
Fei GuoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4614-773X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a high-market-value sector, the consumer electronics industry is particularly vulnerable to reputational damage from surface defects in shipped products. However, the high level of automation and the short product life cycles in this industry make defect sample collection both difficult and inefficient. This challenge has led to a severe shortage of publicly available, comprehensive datasets dedicated to surface defect detection, limiting the development of targeted methodologies in the academic community. Most existing datasets focus on general-purpose object categories, such as those in the COCO and PASCAL VOC datasets, or on industrial surfaces, such as those in the MvTec AD and ZJU-Leaper datasets. However, these datasets differ significantly in structure, defect types, and imaging conditions from those specific to consumer electronics. As a result, models trained on them often perform poorly when applied to surface defect detection tasks in this domain. To address this issue, the present study introduces a specialized optical sampling system with six distinct lighting configurations, each designed to highlight different surface defect types. These lighting conditions were calibrated by experienced optical engineers to maximize defect visibility and detectability. Using this system, 14,478 high-resolution defect images were collected from actual production environments. These images cover more than six defect types, such as scratches, plain particles, edge particles, dirt, collisions, and unknown defects. After data acquisition, senior quality control inspectors and manufacturing engineers established standardized annotation criteria based on real-world industrial acceptance standards. Annotations were then applied using bounding boxes for object detection and pixelwise masks for semantic segmentation. In addition to the dataset construction scheme, commonly used semantic segmentation methods were benchmarked using the provided mask annotations. The resulting dataset has been made publicly available to support the research community in developing, testing, and refining advanced surface defect detection algorithms under realistic conditions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive, multiclass, multi-defect dataset for surface defect detection in the consumer electronics domain that provides pixel-level ground-truth annotations and is explicitly designed for real-world applications.

Indexed as

dataset of surface defects in consumer electronicsobject detectionsegmentationsurface defect detection in consumer electronics

Identifiers

PMID40807704
PMCPMC12349538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.