Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807560›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comparison of Capillary Electrophoresis and HPLC-Based Methods in the Monitoring of Moniliformin in Maize.

Sara Astolfi, Francesca Buiarelli, Francesca Debegnach, Barbara De Santis, Patrizia Di Filippo, Donatella Pomata, Carmela Riccardi, Giulia Simonetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara AstolfiDepartment of Chemistry, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-3966-3753
Francesca BuiarelliDepartment of Chemistry, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5104-8854
Francesca DebegnachDepartment of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8447-5948
Barbara De SantisDepartment of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4210-2796
Patrizia Di FilippoInail DIT-Via Roberto Ferruzzi, 38, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-1691
Donatella PomataInail DIT-Via Roberto Ferruzzi, 38, 00143 Rome, Italy.
Carmela RiccardiInail DIT-Via Roberto Ferruzzi, 38, 00143 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-6049
Giulia SimonettiDepartment of Chemistry, "Sapienza" University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6278-6905

Funding

a) Sapienza Università di Roma Progetti di Ricerca (Piccoli, Medi) - Progetti Medi" anno 2024 ; b) The Italian Workers' Compensation Authority (INAIL, Italy a ) RM12419107DB53DC ; b) Research Division, [Ricerca Istituzionale 2025/27].
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few decades, scientific interest in mycotoxins-fungal metabolites that pose serious concern to food safety, crop health, and both human and animal health-has increased. While major mycotoxins such as aflatoxins, ochratoxins, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins, zearalenone, citrinin, patulin, and ergot alkaloids are well studied, emerging mycotoxins remain underexplored and insufficiently investigated. Among these, moniliformin (MON) is frequently detected in maize-based food and feed; however, the absence of regulatory limits and standardized detection methods limits effective monitoring and comprehensive risk assessment. The European Food Safety Authority highlights insufficient occurrence and toxicological data as challenges to regulatory development. This study compares three analytical methods-CE-DAD, HPLC-DAD, and HPLC-MS/MS-for moniliformin detection and quantification in maize, evaluating linear range, correlation coefficients, detection and quantification limits, accuracy, and precision. Results show that CE-DAD and HPLC-MS/MS provide reliable and comparable sensitivity and selectivity, while HPLC-DAD is less sensitive. Application to real samples enabled deterministic dietary exposure estimation based on consumption, supporting preliminary risk characterization. This research provides a critical comparison that supports the advancement of improved monitoring and risk assessment frameworks, representing a key step toward innovating the detection of under-monitored mycotoxins and laying the groundwork for future regulatory and preventive measures targeting MON.

Indexed as

CE-DADemerging mycotoxinsfood contaminationHPLC-DAD/HPLC-MS-MSmoniliformin (MON)risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID40807560
PMCPMC12345993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.