Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807531›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

An Investigation into the Sensory Properties of Luffa (

Matthew Code, Matthew B McSweeney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew CodeSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-7890-8344
Matthew B McSweeneySchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS B4P 2R6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-5639

Funding

Centre for the Sensory Research of Food (Acadia University) N/AInvest Nova Scotia N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luffa fruit is an underutilized and novel ingredient in North America. To increase the shelf life of luffa fruit, this study evaluated the creation of luffa fruit powder using three different drying temperatures (40 °C, 50 °C, and 60 °C). The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensory properties and acceptability of luffa fruit powder with unfamiliar consumers (those who do not regularly eat luffa fruit). Participants (n = 88) evaluated the luffa fruit powders mixed into couscous, as well as a control (couscous without luffa fruit powder) using check-all-that-apply and hedonic scales. Furthermore, the participants were asked how they felt about luffa fruit powder after evaluating the samples (comment question). The hedonic scores were not significantly affected by the addition of the luffa seed powders dried at different temperatures. However, the luffa seed powder was associated with a mild flavour, as well as being described as earthy and vegetal. The participants did indicate that the luffa seed powder added moistness to the couscous. As the drying temperature increased so did the intensity of the flavour. Furthermore, participants indicated they would be interested in luffa seed powder if it has nutritional benefits. Overall, this study investigated the sensory properties of a novel ingredient, luffa seed powder, and future studies should continue to explore its sensory properties and chemical components.

Indexed as

check-all-that-applyconsumer perceptionfood neophobiahedonicluffanew ingredientsnovel ingredientssensory perceptionsponge gourd

Identifiers

PMID40807531
PMCPMC12345927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.