Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807340›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Polystyrene Upcycling via Photocatalytic and Non-Photocatalytic Degradation.

Terry Yang, Yalan Xing

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Terry YangDepartment of Chemistry, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11550, USA.
Yalan XingDepartment of Chemistry, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11550, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1176-9969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid increase in polystyrene (PS) production has led to substantial growth in plastic waste, posing serious environmental and waste management challenges. Current disposal techniques are unsustainable, relying heavily on harsh conditions, high energy input, and generating environmentally harmful byproducts. This review critically discusses alternative green approaches for PS treatment through photocatalytic and non-photocatalytic upcycling methods. Photocatalytic methods utilize light energy (UV, visible, or broad-spectrum irradiation) to initiate radical reactions that cleave the inert carbon backbone of PS. In contrast, non-photocatalytic strategies achieve backbone degradation without direct light activation, often employing catalysts and thermal energy. Both approaches effectively transform PS waste into higher-value compounds, such as benzoic acid and acetophenone, though yields remain moderate for most reported methods. Current limitations, including catalyst performance, low yields, and impurities in real-world PS waste, are highlighted. Future directions toward enhancing the efficiency, selectivity, and scalability of PS upcycling processes are proposed to address the growing plastic waste crisis sustainably.

Indexed as

degradationphotocatalyticplasticpolystyreneupcycling

Identifiers

PMID40807340
PMCPMC12348219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.