Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807311›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Sustainable Adhesive Formulation and Performance Evaluation of Bacterial Nanocellulose and Aloe Vera for Packaging Applications.

Urška Vrabič-Brodnjak, Aljana Vidmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Urška Vrabič-BrodnjakFaculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Department of Textiles, Graphic Arts and Design, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0865-8619
Aljana VidmarFaculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Department of Textiles, Graphic Arts and Design, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 12, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of bio-based adhesives as sustainable alternatives to synthetic formulations presents a significant opportunity for advancing environmental sustainability in packaging applications. This research aimed to develop and evaluate a bio-based adhesive derived from bacterial nanocellulose (BNC), aloe vera and its mixtures as a potential replacement for commercial synthetic adhesives. Aloe vera, selected for its polysaccharide-rich composition, served as a natural polymeric matrix, while BNC contributed reinforcing properties. The adhesive formulations, with and without BNC, were compared to a commercial adhesive to assess their mechanical performance. T-peel and shear tests were conducted on smooth and rough paper substrates to evaluate adhesive strength. The bio-based adhesive incorporating BNC demonstrated superior shear and peel strength on rough substrates due to enhanced mechanical interlocking within the fibrous structure of paper, whereas performance on smooth surfaces was hindered by uneven BNC distribution, reducing adhesive-substrate interaction. Although the commercial adhesive achieved higher absolute maximum force values, the bio-based formulation exhibited comparable mechanical stability under specific conditions. These findings underscore the influence of substrate properties and application methods on adhesive performance, highlighting the potential of bio-based adhesives in packaging applications and the need for further formulation optimization to fully realize their advantages over traditional synthetic adhesives.

Indexed as

AdhesivesAloeCelluloseNanostructuresAdhesivesCellulosebio-based adhesivespackaging applicationssubstrate interactionsustainable materialssynthetic adhesive alternatives

Identifiers

PMID40807311
PMCPMC12348661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.