ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Modern Era: Evidence, Equity, and Evolving Delivery Models Across the Cardiovascular Spectrum.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Rehabilitation-Current Paradigms and Challenges Across the Cardiovascular Continuum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrolment, Participation, and Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Auckland, New Zealand.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- From Continuous-Flow Mechanical Circulatory Support to Heart Transplantation: Hemodynamic, Immunometabolic, and Body Composition Determinants of Rehabilitation Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap: Multidisciplinary Decision Making to Address Systemic Barriers in Cardiovascular Care.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Mapping of Early Exercise-Based Interventions for Patients Recovering From Acute Heart Failure: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Patient characteristics of non-participants and reasons for non-participation in cardiac (tele)rehabilitation-a prospective analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Short-term transitions in health-promoting lifestyle profiles following first-time percutaneous coronary intervention: a latent profile transition analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The Role of Early Rehabilitation in Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CR is a cornerstone of secondary prevention for cardiovascular disease, offering well-established benefits across mortality, hospital readmission, functional capacity, and quality of life. Despite Class I guideline endorsements and decades of supporting evidence, CR remains vastly underutilized, particularly among women, racial and ethnic minorities, older adults, and individuals in low-resource settings. This review synthesizes the current evidence base for CR, with emphasis on disease-specific benefits across different cardiovascular diseases, and highlights recent data on its role in expanding populations, including patients with HFpEF, older adults, patients with advanced heart failure, and those undergoing transcatheter interventions. We also examine persistent barriers to CR access and participation, including system-level and referral limitations, as well as patient-level disparities by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Building on this, we explore innovative delivery models and recent policy initiatives such as hybrid programs and reimbursement reform, all designed to expand access, promote equity, and modernize CR delivery. The findings underscore the need for continued investment, advocacy, and innovation to ensure equitable access to CR and its life-saving benefits across the full cardiovascular care continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.