ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Beyond Uncertainty: Establishing the Oda Strategy for the Treatment of Acute Aortic Dissection.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant progress has been achieved in the treatment of acute aortic dissection over the past 90 years, following the first surgical intervention. This review pays tribute to the dedication of pioneers and innovators who developed advanced medical devices and therapeutic strategies to address this challenging condition. While navigating uncertainties in treatment optimization, the primary focus of the therapeutic strategies has been to save lives by increasing survival rates during the acute phase and to prevent aorta-related lethal events and late-stage thoracoabdominal aortic replacements. From a neutral standpoint, this review traces over 90 years of progress in treating acute aortic dissection. We hope that as many patients as possible will receive treatment rationally, without over- or under-treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.