Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40807053›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Targeting Psychotic and Cognitive Dimensions in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (CHR-P): A Narrative Review.

Michele Ribolsi, Federico Fiori Nastro, Martina Pelle, Eleonora Esposto, Tommaso B Jannini, Giorgio Di Lorenzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Paradoxical Effect of Cannabis Use on Cognition in Chronic Psychotic Disorders.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele RibolsiDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Federico Fiori NastroDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2970-8419
Martina PelleDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-8835-172X
Eleonora EspostoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Tommaso B JanniniDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2936-4150
Giorgio Di LorenzoDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-4064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a debilitating disorder with substantial societal and economic impacts. The clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P) state generally precedes the onset of SCZ, offering a window for early intervention. However, treatment guidelines for CHR-P individuals remain contentious, particularly regarding antipsychotic (AP) medications. Although several studies have examined the effects of APs on reducing the risk of conversion to psychosis, the novelty of this narrative review lies in its focus on differentiating APs' effects on positive and negative symptoms, as well as cognitive functioning, in CHR-P individuals. Evidence suggests that APs may be cautiously recommended for attenuated positive symptoms to stabilize individuals for psychological interventions, but their use in treating negative symptoms is generally discouraged due to limited efficacy and potential side effects. Similarly, the effects of APs on cognitive abilities remain underexplored, with results indicating a lack of significant neurocognitive outcomes. In conclusion, APs' use in CHR-P patients requires careful consideration due to limited evidence and potential adverse effects. Future research should focus on individual symptom domains and treatment modalities to optimize outcomes in this critical population. Until then, a cautious approach emphasizing non-pharmacological interventions is advisable.

Indexed as

antipsychoticsCHR-Pclinical high risk of psychosiscognitive abilitiesnegative symptomspositive symptomsUHRultra-high risk of psychosis

Identifiers

PMID40807053
PMCPMC12347961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.