ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Cardiogenic Shock: Current Evidence, Clinical Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory Analysis of Early Renal Function Changes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): Limited Predictive Value Beyond Baseline Renal Function.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Left Atrial-to-Femoral Arterial Bypass Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Transcatheter management of cardiogenic shock in severe aortic stenosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) in the setting of severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents a critical and high-risk scenario with limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), initially reserved for inoperable or high-risk surgical candidates, is increasingly being considered in patients with CS due to improvements in device technology, operator experience, and supportive care. This review synthesizes current evidence from large registries, observational studies, and meta-analyses that support the feasibility, safety, and potential survival benefit of urgent or emergent TAVI in selected CS patients. Procedural success is high, and early intervention appears to confer improved short-term and mid-term outcomes compared to balloon aortic valvuloplasty or medical therapy alone. Critical factors influencing prognosis include lactate levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, renal function, and timing of intervention. The absence of formal guidelines, logistical constraints, and ethical concerns complicate decision-making in this unstable population. A multidisciplinary Heart Team/Shock Team approach is essential to identify appropriate candidates, manage procedural risk, and guide post-intervention care. Further studies and the development of TAVI-specific risk models in CS are anticipated to refine patient selection and therapeutic strategies. TAVI may represent a transformative option for stabilizing hemodynamics and improving outcomes in this otherwise high-mortality group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.