ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Extracorporeal CPR Performance Metrics in Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Stepwise and Evidence-Based Appraisal of the VA-ECMO Implementation Process.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an established intervention for select patients experiencing refractory cardiac arrest. Among modifiable predictors of survival and neurologic recovery during ECPR implementation, timely restoration of circulation remains critical in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest (CA). The in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) setting is particularly amenable to reducing the low-flow interval through structured system-based design and implementation. Despite increasing utilization of ECPR, the literature remains limited regarding operational standards, quality improvement metrics, and performance evaluation. Establishing operational standards and performance metrics is a critical first step toward systematically reducing low-flow interval duration. In support of this aim, we conducted a comprehensive literature review structured around the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) framework for ECPR implementation. At each step, we synthesized evidence-based best practices and identified operational factors that directly influence time-to-circulation. Our goal is to provide a stepwise evaluation of ECPR initiation to consolidate existing best practices and highlight process components with potential for further study and standardization. We further evaluated the literature surrounding key technical components of ECPR, including cannula selection, placement technique, and positioning. Ongoing research is needed to refine and standardize each stage of the ECPR workflow. Developing optimized, protocol-driven approaches to ensure rapid, high-quality deployment will be essential for improving outcomes with this lifesaving but resource-intensive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.