ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Pediatric Echocardiographic Nomograms: Twenty Years of Advances-Do We Now Have a Complete and Reliable Tool, or Are Gaps Still Present? An Up-to-Date Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for diagnosing cardiac disease in children, with quantitation largely based on nomograms. Over the past decade, significant efforts have been made to address the numerical and methodological limitations of earlier nomograms. As a result, robust and reliable pediatric echocardiographic nomograms are now available for most two-dimensional anatomical measurements, three-dimensional volumes, and strain parameters. These more recent nomograms are based on adequate sample sizes, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, and rigorous statistical methodologies. They have demonstrated good reproducibility with minimal differences across different authors, establishing them as reliable diagnostic tools. Despite these advances, some limitations persist. Certain ethnic groups remain underrepresented, and data for preterm and low-weight infants are still limited. Most existing nomograms are derived from European and North American populations, with sparse data from Asia and very limited data from Africa and South America. Nomograms for preterm and low-weight infants are few and cover only selected cardiac structures. Although diastolic parameter nomograms are available, the data remain heterogeneous due to challenges in normalizing functional parameters according to age and body size. The accessibility of current nomograms has greatly improved with the development of online calculators and mobile applications. Ideally, integration of nomograms into echocardiographic machines and reporting systems should be pursued. Future studies are needed to develop broader, more comprehensive, and multi-ethnic nomograms, with better representation of preterm and low-weight populations, and to validate new parameters derived from emerging three- and four-dimensional echocardiographic techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.