Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40806825›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Management of Recurrent and Aggressive Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas.

Nicole A Hefner, Odelia Cooper

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole A HefnerDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-078X
Odelia CooperPituitary Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5955-8242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) behave aggressively or recur after first-line surgical treatment, it can be challenging to decide whether and how to escalate therapy. Up to 47% of patients with residual tumor after transsphenoidal surgery will show disease recurrence or progression and may require an intervention. Repeat surgical resection can be attempted in select cases if the tumor is accessible; for the remainder of patients, non-surgical treatment options may need to be considered. Radiotherapy can control tumor growth in 75% of NFPAs, but confers increased risk of hypopituitarism and other disorders. Currently, there are no medical therapies approved for patients with recurrent or aggressive NFPA. However, several have been investigated, including temozolomide, somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. We present a review of the available evidence to provide guidance for pituitary endocrinologists and neuro-oncologists when treating patients with recurrent or aggressive NFPA.

Indexed as

dopamine agonistimmune checkpoint inhibitornonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA)peptide receptor radionuclide therapysomatostatin receptor ligand (SRL)temozolomidevascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID40806825
PMCPMC12346931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.