Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40806740›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Dissecting Tumor Heterogeneity by Liquid Biopsy-A Comparative Analysis of Post-Mortem Tissue and Pre-Mortem Liquid Biopsies in Solid Neoplasias.

Tatiana Mögele, Kathrin Hildebrand, Aziz Sultan, Sebastian Sommer, Lukas Rentschler, Maria Kling, Irmengard Sax, Matthias Schlesner, Bruno Märkl, Martin Trepel and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tatiana MögelePathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Kathrin HildebrandPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Aziz SultanHematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Sebastian SommerMVZ-Onkologie im Elisenhof, 80335 Munich, Germany.
Lukas RentschlerPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Maria KlingPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Irmengard SaxBiomedical Informatics, Data Mining and Data Analytics, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.
Matthias SchlesnerBiomedical Informatics, Data Mining and Data Analytics, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5896-4086
Bruno MärklPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.
Martin TrepelBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Maximilian SchmutzBavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7453-7260
Rainer ClausPathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-8766

Funding

Intramural funding program of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg (ALPS). n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity encompasses genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic diversity, impacting treatment response and resistance. Spatial heterogeneity occurs both inter- and intra-lesionally, while temporal heterogeneity results from clonal evolution. High-throughput technologies like next-generation sequencing (NGS) enhance tumor characterization, but conventional biopsies still do not adequately capture genetic heterogeneity. Liquid biopsy (LBx), analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), provides a minimally invasive alternative, offering real-time tumor evolution insights and identifying resistance mutations overlooked by tissue biopsies. This study evaluates the capability of LBx to capture tumor heterogeneity by comparing genetic profiles from multiple metastatic lesions and LBx samples. Eight patients from the Augsburger Longitudinal Plasma Study with various types of cancer provided 56 postmortem tissue samples, which were compared against pre-mortem LBx-derived circulating-free DNA sequenced by NGS. Tissue analyses revealed significant mutational diversity (4-12 mutations per patient, VAFs: 1.5-71.4%), with distinct intra- and inter-lesional heterogeneity. LBx identified 51 variants (4-17 per patient, VAFs: 0.2-31.1%), which overlapped with mutations from the tissue samples by 33-92%. Notably, 22 tissue variants were absent in LBx, whereas 18 LBx-exclusive variants were detected (VAFs: 0.2-2.8%). LBx effectively captures tumor heterogeneity, but should be used in conjunction with tissue biopsies for comprehensive genetic profiling.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAGenetic HeterogeneityNeoplasmsAgedAutopsyBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMutationBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAclonal evolutionliquid biopsymutational landscape and molecular pathologyNGStumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID40806740
PMCPMC12347833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.