ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Dissecting Tumor Heterogeneity by Liquid Biopsy-A Comparative Analysis of Post-Mortem Tissue and Pre-Mortem Liquid Biopsies in Solid Neoplasias.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy: Protocol for a Prospective, Longitudinal Multicenter Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Integration of Nanotechnology with ctDNA: New Advances for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Multidimensional tumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (GEA): Evidence and Emerging Applications.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity encompasses genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic diversity, impacting treatment response and resistance. Spatial heterogeneity occurs both inter- and intra-lesionally, while temporal heterogeneity results from clonal evolution. High-throughput technologies like next-generation sequencing (NGS) enhance tumor characterization, but conventional biopsies still do not adequately capture genetic heterogeneity. Liquid biopsy (LBx), analyzing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), provides a minimally invasive alternative, offering real-time tumor evolution insights and identifying resistance mutations overlooked by tissue biopsies. This study evaluates the capability of LBx to capture tumor heterogeneity by comparing genetic profiles from multiple metastatic lesions and LBx samples. Eight patients from the Augsburger Longitudinal Plasma Study with various types of cancer provided 56 postmortem tissue samples, which were compared against pre-mortem LBx-derived circulating-free DNA sequenced by NGS. Tissue analyses revealed significant mutational diversity (4-12 mutations per patient, VAFs: 1.5-71.4%), with distinct intra- and inter-lesional heterogeneity. LBx identified 51 variants (4-17 per patient, VAFs: 0.2-31.1%), which overlapped with mutations from the tissue samples by 33-92%. Notably, 22 tissue variants were absent in LBx, whereas 18 LBx-exclusive variants were detected (VAFs: 0.2-2.8%). LBx effectively captures tumor heterogeneity, but should be used in conjunction with tissue biopsies for comprehensive genetic profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.