SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Monocyte Distribution Width for Sepsis Diagnosis in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy and severity prediction of monocyte distribution width in sepsis: a retrospective study from the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Monocyte Distribution Width for Early Sepsis Detection in Cancer-Enriched Emergency Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We planned a systemic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Monocyte Distribution Width (MDW) in aiding the diagnosis of sepsis in the Emergency Department (ED) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and OVID to retrieve studies published up to 29 January 2024. We examined results using mean difference and conducted a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis using a bivariate random effects model. Pooled results showed that MDW was significantly higher in sepsis patients admitted to the ED (MD = 5.59, 95%CI: 4.14-7.05) or to the ICU (MD = 8.30, 95%CI: 2.98-13.62). Nine studies conducted in the ED were included in the DTA review. The overall sensitivity was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.75-0.85), the specificity was 0.76 (95%CI: 0.66-0.83), and the false-positive rate (FPR) was 0.24 (95%CI: 0.17-0.34). Three studies were conducted in the ICU, but only two were included in the DTA meta-analysis. Of the 662 patients admitted to the ICU, 175 developed sepsis, showing higher MDW values than non-septic patients. However, significant heterogeneity was noted among the studies. MDW is a helpful biomarker for sepsis in adult patients admitted to the ED and ICU. In the ED, MDW could aid clinicians in ruling out sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.