ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed for 40 patients with B-ALL undergoing treatment according to the ALL-2016 protocol to investigate the copy number alterations (CNAs) and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) associated with minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive remission. Aberrations involving over 20,000 genes were identified, and a random forest approach was applied to isolate a subset of genes whose CNAs and cnLOH are significantly associated with poor therapeutic response. We have assembled the triple matched healthy population data and used that data as a reference, but not as a matched control. We identified a recurrent cluster of cnLOH in the 19q13.2-19q13.31 region, significantly enriched in MRD-positive patients (70% vs. 47% in the reference group vs. 16% in MRD-negative patients). This region includes the pregnancy-specific glycoprotein (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.